LaFerrari tested on R&T | Page 2 | FerrariChat

LaFerrari tested on R&T

Discussion in '288GTO/F40/F50/Enzo/LaFerrari/F80' started by F40 LeMans, Mar 31, 2015.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Nospinzone

    Nospinzone F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2013
    Messages:
    7,808
    Location:
    Weston, MA
    Full Name:
    Paul
    I wouldn't believe it even if it wasn't April 1st. ;)
     
  2. INTMD8

    INTMD8 F1 Veteran Owner Silver Subscribed

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,815
    Location:
    Lake Villa IL
    149 trap speed kicks ass!
     
  3. Phil~

    Phil~ F1 Rookie Rossa Subscribed

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2013
    Messages:
    3,937
    Location:
    Potomac, Maryland
  4. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    May 23, 2006
    Messages:
    57,525
    Location:
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
  5. NürScud

    NürScud F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2012
    Messages:
    7,308
    This is fast. Really fast!
     
  6. Bronzage

    Bronzage Formula 3

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,129
    Location:
    West Africa
    Full Name:
    MJ
    Thats a great set of numbers, however I didn't see some cars on their that I would assume should be…Speciale, GTO, Pagani? Also…weird how the 599 is quicker than a F12!

    Interesting and lots of fun to go through.

    MJ
     
  7. Zaius

    Zaius Formula Junior

    Joined:
    May 8, 2014
    Messages:
    863
    I dunno about this wikipedia article, 458's run 10's now?
     
  8. ag512bbi

    ag512bbi F1 Veteran Owner Silver Subscribed

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Messages:
    7,723
    Location:
    So. Cal
    Full Name:
    Armen
    LOVE IT!!!
     
  9. FerrariF50lover

    FerrariF50lover Formula 3

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,383
    Location:
    Ohio
    Full Name:
    Nate
    Those are estimates if I'm not mistaken. They never did a true 1/4 test with the car. I have a hard time beliving it trapped 149 when one recently got beat up by a veyron that traps 144. It's not even close.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkqSVm__UIU
     
  10. FerrariF50lover

    FerrariF50lover Formula 3

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,383
    Location:
    Ohio
    Full Name:
    Nate
  11. supermafy

    supermafy Formula Junior

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2013
    Messages:
    361
    Location:
    Rome (it)
    I think this time (finally) are vboxed
     
  12. FerrariF50lover

    FerrariF50lover Formula 3

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,383
    Location:
    Ohio
    Full Name:
    Nate
    I don't understand how it got humiliated by a Veyron then. A car that is supposedly quite a bit slower.
     
  13. Phil~

    Phil~ F1 Rookie Rossa Subscribed

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2013
    Messages:
    3,937
    Location:
    Potomac, Maryland
    Verdon is Awd.....and no slouch.
     
  14. amenasce

    amenasce Three Time F1 World Champ Silver Subscribed

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2001
    Messages:
    34,621
    Full Name:
    Joe Mansion
    Wet or damp conditions? If you cant go full throttle or if traction control is kicking all the time from 1st to 4th gear it will slow you down.
     
  15. dros1

    dros1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2014
    Messages:
    13
  16. ypsilon

    ypsilon F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    May 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,636
    Location:
    the Netherlands
  17. any_1

    any_1 Formula 3

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,072
    Location:
    Sweden
    is it a true production car or a car preped by the factory with tweaked computers and the works?
     
  18. 250 lusso

    250 lusso Karting

    Joined:
    May 2, 2004
    Messages:
    168
    As Doom had pointed out in an earlier post, the Veyron was in its top speed / low drag aero mode when it beat the LaF in that side-by-side drag race. Aero starts to play a exponentially greater role as speed increases. It can make a very noticeable difference, even with very powerful cars, above 100mph.

    In an earlier race the LaF showed a clean pair of heels to the Bug when the Bug was in normal "high downforce" mode.

    So the magazine test numbers you are referring to could easily be explained by the Bug in that test(s) being run in high downforce / high drag mode for the 1/4 mile tests.

    Beyond that, no two examples of "identical" cars are ever truly identical. The magazine test Bug may have been a less-than-optimized example, or running in less favorable air or traction circumstances. It also may have simple been "new." Many cars actually pick up a bit of performance when they are broken in with 10-12K miles. You can verify that by looking at almost any long-term test run by a magazine.
     
  19. Super_Dave

    Super_Dave Formula Junior

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2014
    Messages:
    710
    Location:
    USA
    Full Name:
    Dave
    No offense but the high drag vs. low drag for the quarter mile for the veyron wouldn't make the biggest difference here. Almost certainly it is traction for the LaF on a wet track and RWD... Veyron is still extremely impressive (and may be fast 80% of the time and in most conditions).
     
  20. REALZEUS

    REALZEUS F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    8,506
    Location:
    Bournemouth, UK
    Damp track favours 4WD! Given dry conditions, the LF is faster up to around 200mph. Then the Bug's higher top speed potential takes over.
     
  21. F40 LeMans

    F40 LeMans Formula Junior

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2009
    Messages:
    826
    We have to wait to know, the car is a factory car anyway.
     
  22. dros1

    dros1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2014
    Messages:
    13
    Whats your point, captain obvious?
     

Share This Page