This car is a bit softer with more exaggerated curves than others in the current Ferrari line up. Image Unavailable, Please Login
RWD + probably underestimated numbers on purpose... (SF90 = 2.19s 0-62 and 6.3s 0-124 vs 2.5/6.7s on paper)
The official render looks spectacular, more aggressive than the final product imho. Image Unavailable, Please Login Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Since beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I will stick with my comment. When it comes to sports cars I happen to like more aggressive designs, over more elegant ones. The 296 is too plain IMHO. Mind you, I find it good looking, but a bit vanilla.
Overall I think they've done it. Its certainly a pretty car and looks like "a Ferrari". There's some really bold details, particularly in the back half of the car. Although I'm not a fan of the complexities of hybrids, its got plenty of power and a decent all electric range for those who need it The interior is simple but straightforward. There's a minimum of buttons everywhere. The only question is the price. If you can't walk out for less than $400K with the options you need, its hard to justify.
Ferrari naming convention is all over the place. You have capacity and cylinders, you have horsepower and cylinders, you have cylinder capacity, you have chronology, you have names... it's by far the most chaotic naming strategy in the whole industry. I for one am happy it doesn't bear the Dino name, as this would suggest a lower end car.
I think it looks fantastic! Curious what the actual US price will be because I have not seen any concrete mention of the price.
The original Turbo So you can see they kept some of the Ferrari DNA that carries over several cars. Image Unavailable, Please Login