I currently own a 360 Spider, and have often thought that I would like to buy a Murcielago. Now that a number of Murcielago's have depreciated substantially, I am casually starting my search. However, here is my dilemma. I don't think that I can logically justify owning both cars. I only drive my 360 on the weekends, and I couldn't justify having 2 weekend cars to the tune of $400K++. I loooove the 360 Spider. Absolutely love it. BUT, the Murcielago is just a monster of a car. There are many differences to these cars, most strikingly the hardtop vs. convertible, V12 vs. V8, etc. Now I know that this is a Ferrari board, and I am a Ferrari fan to the bone. But, I was wondering if I could get some objective opinions from fellow F-Chatters. If it came down to owning only 1 of the Murcielago or 360 Spider, which car would you choose? I know, "just own both", right? That would be a great combo. But, I'm asking the question assuming that is not a practical option. So, let's hear the opinions! And, let's try to avoid a Lambo vs. Ferrari war in this thread, and try to offer some friendly info. Both are unquestionably great cars. Thanks.