Merc to give up on 2010 WDC? | Page 2 | FerrariChat

Merc to give up on 2010 WDC?

Discussion in 'F1' started by tifosi12, Apr 5, 2010.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. ApexOversteer

    ApexOversteer F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2007
    Messages:
    5,968
    Location:
    Smoky Mountains, TN
    Full Name:
    T.A. Bell
    I agree they should be allowed a day of testing at the permanent European GP tracks (overseas testing just too costly in "cost cutting times", and extra days at street courses just not feasible), but that day should be Monday after a GP not Thursday before a GP. Teams focus on vastly different things in a GP practice session than they do at a test not connected to a specific GP. Move it to Monday and it becomes an actual test, rather than just an extra practice session for the GP.
     
  2. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    23,397
    Location:
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    Fair comment. I agree they couldn't do it at all of the races, but getting there a day early, or staying a day later, can't possibly add much to the budget.

    I'd be happy with either day, and don't even have a problem with them using it as "extended practice" for the upcoming race - Why not? Each team can choose whether to use Thursday to try and find "short term" gains for the upcoming race or to try out longer term ideas/parts etc.

    I suspect the "problem" with Monday is that many of 'em won't be able to run due to crashes/ka-blamo's etc etc.

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  3. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    30,786
    Location:
    FRA - nice city with a really big airport :)
    Until testing is allowed more teams will give up...ie use the rest of the season as a test bed. Great for competition(hardly).
    More silliness. More stupidity and have costs been reduced?? Fix the engine rule and testing and I think we might have better racing. At least the rules would be rational in some way.
     
  4. ApexOversteer

    ApexOversteer F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2007
    Messages:
    5,968
    Location:
    Smoky Mountains, TN
    Full Name:
    T.A. Bell
    Well, for one thing the teams should be allowed a T-car again. They're already bringing a 3rd car to races,in boxes, not actually assembled into a car. Allow them to bring that 3rd car and allow an allocation of "testing" engines, which cannot be used as "race" engines, say 1 engine per test session.

    I also think that during such a test session a significant percentage of the laps done should be driven by a designated test driver. Say 40%. This will allow for up-and-coming drivers some seat time and further differentiate testing from the GP meeting.

    I just think that testing should be separated from the GP weekend. Giving the teams more track time ahead of a GP will extend the gap between the teams for that GP. Having the test session after the GP gives them generic track time to improve the car, but not any specific data to use at that circuit for another 12 months. Testing should be more about the car, not the track.
     
    Last edited: Apr 6, 2010
  5. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    23,397
    Location:
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    +1 without wishing to fire Steve up again, another of Mad Max's stupid ideas! ;)

    Now that idea I *really* like! They've all already got their third/reserve drivers on site - Let 'em at it!

    Possibly. How about my idea that the podium teams can't participate in said tests? Give everyone else a chance to close the gap?

    Again, fair comment. As I said, I'd be happy either way!

    Cheers,
    Ian
     

Share This Page