SUV Lamborghini did it will Ferrari be the next one?

The Bentayga was very comfortable! It makes you feel more secure on the road especially if you drive a lot at night between cities and countries like me, something about it, you know what I mean.

 

It really depends. If you choose the AMG version, yes it's not much of an offroader, neither is a Range Rover Sport or the others. So they are the same really. But if you compare a diesel Range Rover to a diesel G, I'd say the G is probably the better offroader. The European military have been using them for over 40 years after.
But the point is not about that with those really. The point for me is mostly that I would not like to be seen in a Bentayga or Urus. I do like the G though, and I think it's fun. Like the Range Rover, the G has a pedigree that gives it a sense of purpose. I've had a G63 offroad, and while the side exhaust causes issues etc. it is better than the Bentayga, Urus, and the rest of the Chelsea tractors.

The FUV I don't care for because I simply don't like the idea of Ferrari building an SUV. I don't get it. There's the Levante and the Stelvio for those who want an FCA italian SUV.

 

Sure. I do think other cars can give you the same sense of security and comfort though. The current G has changed a lot. It's not like the previous that felt very uneasy at speed. But yes, you are in a comfortable and quiet setting that isolates you, and that can most certainly offer a high level of comfort and security.

I actually think the Lusso does this quite well. It cocoons you nicely and at the same time, the car manages to disappear around you when you are just cruising along creating an airy and roomy atmosphere. I wonder if a high riding Ferrari can do the same.

 

I am an ex serviceman, I have driven all of them off road, in really tough conditions. A Discovery is much better off road than a G. The old Defenders are just about the same as a military G (both GD240 and GD290).

Don't like the notion either.

 

The Mercedes-Benz G-Class? It's a beautiful car, but I'v never been to any G-Class before, I wish to though.

As for the FUV, I'm with not against Ferrari needs to open more new markets like it has done with the superb, La ROMA.

 

No big surprises from Aston

https://www.topgear.com/car-news/la-motor-show/its-all-new-542bhp-aston-martin-dbx
Image Unavailable, Please Login

 

Let's talk about this new car, I have created a thread specialy for it!, it's gonna be a very hot topic!
https://www.ferrarichat.com/forum/threads/aston-martin-dbx-astons-new-suv.612706/

 

Not bad looking, the back however is like Donald Duck's bill.

 

This looks better than any other render/version Ive seen.

 

Hope not!!!

 

My opinion is this is the kind of thing Ferrari should avoid. It has to be different- it cannot be a SUV shape with some Ferrari attached. It needs to be a Ferrari, that happens to ride a little higher and perhaps be a little bit taller than the norm. But, my humble opinion, it should not be what Aston and Lamborghini have done.

 

One of the reasons I sold my Urus is that I thought it looked too much like a Lexus SUV. It was a fantastic machine but for $250k I wanted something more unique. Bow you have the Audi RS Q8, Cayenne Coupe Turbo S, and others.

 

I like this one 4000HP, 24 cylinders
Image Unavailable, Please Login

 

mazda?

 

Man, I am not feeling it. I sure hopes it looks more aggressive.

 

As one finds design elements of the DB11 in the new Aston Martin DBX, I expect to also find design elements in the Purosangue which are typical Ferrari. Question is which model they took the design elements from? Is that the Lusso or will it be the 812? Can't wait to find out. Only when I have seen it, I can say whether I like it or not. One thing for sure, it will not have any heritage, it will not be the car model I am thinking of hearing the name Ferrari as that will remain associated with luxury sports-car for some time to come.

 

Image Unavailable, Please Login